
FAA's Crystal Ball: Air traffic to Climb Through 2017
(Continued)
“Collectively, we sell our product below cost; that’s
our problem,” said William Ris, American’s senior vice
president for government affairs.
Soaring airline traffic
The problem is not in attracting passengers, or at least it
shouldn’t be. Collectively, U.S. airline traffic already soared past
pre-9/11 levels in 2004 or 2005, depending on how the traffic is
measured, and the FAA doesn’t see an end in sight to the increasing
popularity of air travel.
Airlines also are filling a record percentage of seats, and the FAA
believes that load factor will inch up just a little bit more.
But the FAA and the airlines believe the industry is nearing a
saturation point on load factors, which means what the U.S. airline
industry really needs is higher fares to offset its higher fuel
costs.
“It’s not anti-consumer to say fares have to come up a bit,” Ris
asserted, “because the fact is if fares don’t come up, airlines are
going to go out of business.”
In that arena, however, the FAA forecast did not provide much
optimism.
The FAA 12-year forecast for domestic yield, the industry’s
barometer for fares, is that it will increase 1.7% a year for
mainline carriers in current-dollar terms, with a 3.7% spurt this
year, but will decline 0.8% a year in inflation-adjusted dollars.
The FAA said it based that forecast “on the assumption that
increased competition from low-cost carriers will continue.”
Many of the big, legacy airlines are shifting their capacity to more
international routes, where they face less low-cost competition and
can charge higher fares. But the FAA yield forecast for
international travel isn’t any different: up 1.7% a year in
current-dollar terms but down 0.8% a year in inflation-adjusted
dollars.
The FAA said the decline in real yields is based on the assumption
that competition “will continue to exert pressures on carriers to
hold the line on fare increases.”
If the FAA is correct on its yield forecast, the airlines can only
hope the FAA also is correct with its fuel price forecast, which
assumes $54 a barrel oil in 2006, falling gradually to under $51 a
barrel in 2010.
Fuel forecasts
The cost of oil was about $62 a barrel the day the FAA released its
forecast. And the FAA forecast doesn’t separately consider the cost
of jet fuel, although the cost of that refined product has increased
even more than the cost of crude oil over the past few years.
FAA forecasters said they use the Office of Management and Budget’s
assumptions on oil prices.
Higher prices cost U.S. carriers $9.6 billion in 2005, “essentially
wiping out the significant improvements made by the legacy carriers
in reducing their operating costs,” the FAA said.
Consumers and airlines also are facing another concern: whether
airports and the air traffic control system will be able to handle
the projected increase in traffic without more air travel congestion
and delays.
Source: Travel Weekly
|
|